Baron von Skippy on 5 May 2003 00:04:01 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Prop: Unbridled Hostility


3. Naming a player defendant in three consecutive CFIs for no reason other than to keep them from judging those CFIs (If there's a reason, state it in the text of the CFI.) [ [What? No, I'm not thinking of anyuinone in partiuincular...] ]

The *only* reason for naming someone the defendant is to keep them from judging it. You might have a variety of reasons for wanting them not to judge - you think they're biased, you don't trust them, you're feeling spiteful - but all of these are different forms of 'to keep them from judging that CFI'.

BTW, Baron, you misspelled 'anyone' and 'particular' :)

-Heh. I'm not going to argue with this because no one has yet gotten kicked for it - it's mostly just fluff at this point. On the other hnad, while I understand why you name someone defendant, if you don't want them to judge, say, becuase you're challenging them, then you could argue a second reason - conflict of interest. "No reason other than to keep them from judging" specifically implies spite / hostility / unbridled hostility. Anyway, it doesn't matter any more.-

[[BvS]]

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss