[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Prop: Unbridled Hostility

["Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 3. Naming a player defendant in three consecutive CFIs for no reason other 
> than to keep them from judging those CFIs (If there's a reason, state it in 
> the text of the CFI.) [ [What? No, I'm not thinking of anyuinone in 
> partiuincular...] ]
>
> The *only* reason for naming someone the defendant is to keep them from 
> judging it. You might have a variety of reasons for wanting them not to 
> judge - you think they're biased, you don't trust them, you're feeling 
> spiteful - but all of these are different forms of 'to keep them from 
> judging that CFI'.
>
> BTW, Baron, you misspelled 'anyone' and 'particular' :)

-Heh. I'm not going to argue with this because no one has yet gotten kicked 
for it - it's mostly just fluff at this point. On the other hnad, while I 
understand why you name someone defendant, if you don't want them to judge, 
say, becuase you're challenging them, then you could argue a second reason - 
conflict of interest. "No reason other than to keep them from judging" 
specifically implies spite / hostility / unbridled hostility. Anyway, it 
doesn't matter any more.-

[[BvS]]

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss