Re: [spoon-discuss] insta-rule questions

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 05:08  PM, Orc In A Spacesuit wrote:

> > I propose:
> > {{
> > __Recycling insta-rules__
> >
> > In section A.3.1 in rule 21 add the following to the table:
> > {{
> > Insta-rules			50
> > }}
>
> Too much.

50 isn't a lot when you take into account losses due to the explosion.

> > Create the following rule:
> > {{
> > __Insta-rules explode__
> >
> > When an insta-rule is destroyed, except when it is repealed, it 
> > explodes. An insta-rule may only explode once. When an insta-rule 
> > explodes, the following occurs, in order:
> > * A can of whoopass is cracked open at its location, hereafter 
> > referred to as the epicenter.
>
> A bit harsh, methinks.

Hence the high payoff.

> > * Any players at the epicenter are thrown, elbonia-style at the 
> > epicenter.
> > * Any insta-rules at the epicenter or adjacent to it explode.
> > * The insta-rule is destroyed.
>
> Hence creating an infinite loop -- all this stuff happens after the 
> destruction of an insta-rule.  Destroying it again will start things 
> over again.  Instant SOE.

Yeah, that would suck.


--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss