bd on 31 Mar 2003 23:18:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] less judges |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 31 March 2003 05:53 pm, Orc In A Spacesuit wrote: > And since we're talking about the ruling, I would love to hear any analysis > on part of anyone else as to why it would be true. As far as I know, I've > disproved every iota of evidence saying it's true, while providing plenty > saying it's false. spoon-discuss is sent publicly, even though it isn't a public forum. spoon-business is both public and a public forum. The rule says they it's legal to privately send them to the administrator, not that it's legal to send them *through a private forum* to the administrator. QED. - -- bd Keep a diary and one day it'll keep you. -- Mae West -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+iMx/x533NjVSos4RArsSAJ9FfzOi1zfRKvEQOWsi43O6kRFqvwCfQilG 6cYe1ndq+Lan2S1g+0vrf4o= =Kzt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss