bd on 25 Mar 2003 00:40:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 37 BALLOT |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 24 March 2003 07:34 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote: > On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 12:09 AM, Glotmorf wrote: > > Following is the M-Tek Position on the Nweek 37 Ballot: > >> Proposal 1380/0: E=MC^2 (bd) > > > > Shelve. Needs a tad more precision, since one insta-rule might not > > only be the opposite of another, it might be the superset of the > > opposite of another. For instance, an insta-rule permitting beer cans > > to be thrown at Wonko and another prohibiting throwing beer cans at > > all players would both be destroyed. > > They'll only mutually annihilate if you bring them together... > > >> Proposal 1388/1: Unlikely Icecapades (Orc In a Spacesuit) > > > > Shelve. "Standard Abuse", despite the fact that it's currently used > > in the rules, is not defined. > > r1269: "Thwocking, Whacking, and Pinballing are all forms of Abuse." > > They're Abuse, and they're standardized, so they're Standard Abuses. > The term 'standard' distinguishes them from any other strange kind of > abuse we might come up with. > > >> Proposal 1391/0: Just one more Nweek... (Baron von Skippy) > > > > Yes. > > A total score reset *and* a 420 point jackpot? Wow. > > >> Proposal 1392/0: But that's MY Nomvivor winnings! (Baron von Skippy) > > > > Yes. > > A tax free 420, even. Hmmm.... > > >> Proposal 1394/0: Fire Burns (Orc In a Spacesuit) > > > > Yes. Though I submit this doesn't qualify under the song form, since > > (a) "fire" is used both as a one-syllable word and a two-syllable > > word, and (b) the fourth line is a syllable short. And remind me to > > slap Wonko for introducing song form... > > It's only used as a two-syll word... and really I just wanted Song Form > because I was so close to getting a Charm Win. > > But then Orc Loopholed past me, and now it doesn't really matter. > > >> Proposal 1395/1: Unanimous Yes (Sheeba) > > > > Shelve. It doesn't say the author of what, or what "all the votes" > > were cast for. I could see this interpreted as, "When someone casts > > all 'yes' votes on a given nweek's ballot, all points e earned from > > that ballot are doubled." I assume that's not what Sheeba meant. I'm > > voting "shelve" rather than "no" because I assume this is a wording > > issue. > > I was thinking it meant that if every game ever cast in the history of > the game was a 'yes' vote, then all props earn double points... Which > would be kind of useless now, but would be an interesting clause to > stick in an initial ruleset... I'll have to write that down somewhere. > > >> Proposal 1396/0: In Memorial (The Voice) > > > > No. Don't make me get unbridledly hostile. > > I change my vote on this to YES, if it's not too late. > > I voted for most of these, IIRC. *points at various headers* - -- bd The PILLSBURY DOUGHBOY is CRYING for an END to BURT REYNOLDS movies!! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+f6Uzx533NjVSos4RAmjaAKDH1NOLYVpLr5prYU8kI0e0lrIzNgCfZ6ei DoZXop3/BRhl+Z27T94DWks= =3wub -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss