Rob Speer on 16 Feb 2003 23:33:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Army mod #4 |
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:45:07PM -0500, Baron von Skippy wrote: > -You mean all or nothing? Then you might lose it outright, you know... What > if it were tempered somewhat? Like, half of what I've got written above > gets done? I mean, if they try to shoot you down and it's not enough, you > get past with damage, which I find preferable to crash-landing in the > middle of a hostile army. I'll change this tomorrow morning. I want to see > what others think first.- I think too many Grid-type rules are "tempered". If you crash-land in the middle of a hostile army, then at least something interesting is happening. We need more sub-game rules where you can take actions that have a noticeable effect, to make them worth doing. -- Rob Speer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss