Baron von Skippy on 16 Feb 2003 04:46:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Army mod #4 |
-You mean all or nothing? Then you might lose it outright, you know... What if it were tempered somewhat? Like, half of what I've got written above gets done? I mean, if they try to shoot you down and it's not enough, you get past with damage, which I find preferable to crash-landing in the middle of a hostile army. I'll change this tomorrow morning. I want to see what others think first.->I propose: > >{{ >__Anti-Air Armies__ > >Add a subsection to 1326.B.1: > >Anti-Air Attacks >Faerie, Insect, Elf, and Alien Armies are Anti-Air Armies. If an >Airspeeder >attempts to move over one of these army types [[like via Vertical >Boosters]], they may Shoot Down that speeder. If they do, the speeder >loses >(1+ (1d5-3)/10)*(Attacking Army's Power) points of Integrity, rounded off >to >the nearest point. >}}I can't be certain of this, but my initial consideration is that this would Piss Me Off. How about "attempt to Shoot Down that speeder, with (formula) being the chance of doing so"?Glotmorf
[[BvS]] _________________________________________________________________Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss