| Glotmorf on 12 Jan 2003 04:14:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] PROP: Oh, how Zen |
On 1/11/03 at 1:31 PM David E. Smith wrote: >> __Ohhhhmmmmmm...__ > >There's no 'h' in the sacred syllable 'OM'. Yes, but remember this game is being played by e-mail, so obviously that there is an e-mantra, for which "ohm" is more appropriate anyway. >> There exists a philosophy named Zen. > >Not unless you also create a philosophical mandate for it, there >doesn't... Not entirely true. One can set one's philosophy to whatever one wants. It just has no impact on the game unless there's a mandate for it. >At any rate, this gives Zen players WAAAAAAY too many extra votes, or at >least has the potential to do so. Bad bad idea. > >(As long as the "extra votes" thingies are relatively rare, I don't have >to try to figure out how to add lots of "extra votes" to the database. I'd >rather like to keep it that way. :-) This I agree with. So far the philosophies (including the Baron's latest attempt at one) give one particular vote under particular circumstances. I'm trying to imagine what uin, who didn't give a rat's donkey about points, shillings or anything else, would do with all the extra votes e'd get for giving everything away. Glotmorf ----- The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss