Glotmorf on 9 Jan 2003 09:09:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] insta-props |
On 1/8/03 at 9:41 PM Orc In A Spacesuit wrote: >I've had this idea for a long time, well before the takeover, but never >got >around to it. Pretty much I'm saying people can make insta props, and >once >enough people say yes, they immidiatly takes effect. > >I propose the following: >{{__Immidiate fixes__ >Create the following rule: >{{__Insta-props__{*(insta-prop), 3*} >An insta-prop is a formal request for a set of rule changes or other >changes >to the game state. >All insta-props have a Name and one of the 4 following attributes: >Pending, >Approved, Denied, and Retracted. >A player may create an insta-prop, only if e has no Pending insta-props. >When an insta-prop is created, it has the attribute Pending. >Pending Insta-props may be revised or retracted by their original author. >When an insta-prop is retracted, it ceases to be Pending and gains the >attribute Retracted. >All players, and the administrator, may Approve or Deny any Pending >insta-prop at any time, even if the player is On Leave. When a player or >the administrator Approves an insta-prop, e becomes Approving of the >insta-prop; when e Denies an insta-prop, e ceases to be Approving of the >insta-prop. If an insta-prop is revised, all players and the >administrator >cease to be Approving of the insta-prop. [[You gotta get everyone to >approve the new version.]] >If one-half of all players are Approving of an insta-prop, or one-half all >players not on Forced Leave and the Administrator are Approving of the >insta-prop, the insta-prop gains the attribute Approved and loses the >attribute Pending. >When an insta-prop becomes Approved, all changes to the rules and other >parts of the game state in the insta-prop take effect, in the the order >they >appear in the insta prop, and all players and the administator cease to be >Approving of the insta-prop. >If an insta-prop has not been revised for 10 ndays, and no player or the >administrator became Approving of that insta-prop during that time, it >becomes Denied. >}} > >Create the following rule: >{{__Bar__{*1001*} >Rule 1229 may be changed by this rule. This rule takes precedence over >Rule >1229. Immidiatly after the creation of this rule, Rule 1229 is repealed, >then this rule is repealed. >}} >}} > >As usual, comments welcome. The only good thing about The Overlord is >that >it will allow fixes to the gamestate; this lets them happen faster when >needed, and requires even more approval than a normal proposal, and so is >much more balanced. A few thoughts... As it's written, it is possible to keep an insta-prop alive indefinitely by switching between Approving and Denying. Is this a bug or a feature? You might want to toss in a Minister. Dave's proposal made the Overlord eir own Minister, presumably because Dave didn't want to manage the docket. He probably wouldn't want to manage insta-props then either. Alternately...could ALL proposals be done this way, without a ballot? Should insta-props have point investiture like regular props? If so, there should be the possibility of loss as well as gain. That would require three states rather than two: Approving, Denying and Neutral. A player who is neither Approving nor Denying regarding an insta-prop is Neutral; should an insta-prop ever get at least half the playerbase, or half the not-on-Forced-Leave playerbase plus the Administrator, Denying it, it fails. Glotmorf ----- The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss