| Glotmorf on 10 Nov 2002 18:50:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Undecided |
On 11/10/02 at 12:36 AM Wonko wrote: >What good is a ruling of UNDECIDED on a CFI? Cleaning up the ruleset, are we? :) My best guess is that it gives the playerbase something to appeal without actually doing anything. A ruling of either TRUE or FALSE actively does something: it establishes a precedent that can be acted upon. This establishes no precedent, gets the assigned judge out from under without putting em on the LMJ and leaves it open to appeal. Next question: Can REFUSED be appealed? If so, what's the difference between that and UNDECIDED? Glotmorf ----- The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss