Glotmorf on 15 Oct 2002 00:00:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Another Band-Aid (TM) For Societies |
On 10/14/02 at 6:26 PM David E. Smith wrote: >Just another random idea, folks. (I realize that I very rarely actually >get any comments on my props, but somehow, putting 'em out there makes me >feel better. :) > > >{{ __Another Band-Aid (TM) For Societies__ > >Insert in Rule 578, as subsection D.1.4: > >{{ >D.1.4. Monarchy > >Any Player who is not a member of the Society may issue a Request For >Admittance (RFA) on a Public Forum. The Monarch of the Society may accept >or decline this RFA at eir sole discretion; this decision is final. > >If a Society is created by player action, the Monarch is the player whose >action created the Society. If the Society is created by a proposal, the >Monarch is the player who authored the proposal. If a proposal is created >by an Unauthored Proposal, or a proposal with multiple authors (i.e. one >submitted by another Society), the proposal must specify the identity of >the Monarch, or else the Society shall not be created. >}} > >In Rule 578, section G.2., remove the second paragraph. Insert in its >place: > >"During the first nweek in which a Society created by player action >exists, the Society shall be treated as if it were created with the >"Monarchy" Standard Method for Joining, instead of any method (standard or >otherwise) specified in its charter." > >[[ During those crucial first few ndays, the boss/prez/whatever gets to >run the show. This section is negotiable; it could create as many >problems as it solves. Comments? ]] > >Insert at the end of the third paragraph of Rule 578, Section D.1. "A >Player consents to joining a Society only by explicitly giving eir consent >on a Public Forum. No player may be forced to join a Society against eir >will." > >[[ there, is THAT clear enough? ]] > >}} I actually like this. Is there any way to make the Monarch concept more general, perhaps part of subsection G, so that there's a standardized "boss", "prez", whatever? It could be referenced in charter changes too, and other places. Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss