Re: [spoon-discuss] For next nweek...

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 08 October 2002 06:28 pm, Wonko wrote:
> Quoth David E. Smith,
>
> > This should take care of a lot of potential problems in the future.
> >
> > {{ __Da Problem Solver__
> >
> > Append to Rule 25 the following:
> >
> > "The Administrator may not also be a player. If at any time the
> > Administrator is also a player, e forfeits the game immediately. This
> > rule takes precedence over all other rules in this regard."
> >
> > Give this rule a Chutzpah of 42.
> >
> > }}
> >
> > [[ There are multiple intended benefits to this:
> > * Someone can rack up a few points by cleaning out all those "If the
> > Administrator is not also a Player..." references. :)
> > * Hopefully, without even the slightest possibility of my choosing to
> > suddenly interfere with the game, people will be more receptive to
> > things like "Wild West Justice" or even a reincarnation of "Let's
> > Make It Imperial".
> > * It codifies existing practice -- I have great difficulty keeping up
> > with the game just running it. Half the time, I don't even get to
> > read proposals; I just cut'n'paste them into the database. It'd be
> > effectively impossible for me to also attempt active participation,
> > unless you folks are partial to only having one ballot a month.
> > ]]
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Why couldn't we at least replace r0 with an Imperial thing? Like, "when an
> emergency is recognized, the admin may make whatever changes to the
> gamestate e deems neccessary to resume play"?

Refresh prop:
{{
The admin makes whatever changes to the gamestate e deems neccessary to resume 
play.
}}

-- 
bd
The secret of success is sincerity.  Once you can fake that, you've got
it made.
		-- Jean Giraudoux

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss