Wonko on 7 Oct 2002 01:57:04 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Wonko's Slaves |
Quoth Orc In A Spacesuit, >> From: Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Except you're on the list of initial members. Which means, by any >> reasonable >> definition of 'initial', 'member', and 'list', that you start out in it, >> regardless of what you later do. I seem to recall you using this to make a >> society in which the Gremlins you named began in the society. No special >> provision is made for players, so the same rules apply to you. >> >> It's too late, pal, yer points are mine. >> >> -- >> Wonko > > Yes, I do believe you just made a huge list of bugs, and decided to exploit > them rather than fix them... You seem a bit out of date. > > From Rule 578/8, __Societies__, G.2: > "Only Players can be initial Members of a Society created by a Player > Action. Entities in the list other than the Player declaring the Society > must state their acceptance of membership into the Society in the same nweek > as the declaration, or will be dropped from the list of initial Members." > > Being on the 'list of initial members' doesn't make us members. > > I just realized the ramifications of this. If interperted the right way, it > could mean that all the 'initial members lists' of all the other societies > didn't do anything, and unless something else added members, those societies > never got members. Oh my. Well, good thing my charter named me Master, and > doesn't requie membership to be the Master. No, being on the list of initial members is pretty initial - that's what the word means. The second part, about dropping off the list, is a violation of r204. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss