Wonko dplepage on Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:25:40 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule |
Quoth Baron von Skippy, >> {{ >> __Mutations BAD! Krunk smash!__ >> >> Amend rule 33 to read as follows: >> {{ >> Each Rule has an attribute called Chutzpah, which is a positive integer. In >> the event of a conflict between two or more rules, if this rule is one, it >> takes precedence. Otherwise, the rule with the highest Chutzpah takes >> precedence. >> >> If two or more rules have equal Chutzpah, the rule with the lowest >> identification number takes precedence. >> >> If at least one of the rules in conflict explicity says of itself that it >> defers to another rule (or type of rule), then such provisions shall >> supersede the Chutzpah method for determining precedence. >> >> If two or more rules claim to take precedence over each other or to defer >> to >> one another, then the Chutzpah method again governs. >> >> Whenever one section of a rule conflicts with another section of the same >> rule, the section which appears later in the rule takes precedence over the >> earlier section. >> >> This rule may not be repealed or amended. >> }} >> Create the following CFI: >> {{ >> Statement: Rule 33 may not be repealed, renumbered, or amended, EVER, and >> this >> CFI cannot be overruled by other CFIs or by any other method. >> }} >> >> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE. >> Appeal the preceding CFI. >> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE. >> }} >> >> -- >> bd >> The above == my from field. Duh. >> > -Didn't I already deal with this? > > {{ > __Bite me, Krunk__ > > Change Rule 33's Serial Number to 100. > > Repeal Rule 100. > }} > - > No, bd added 'renumbered' to the CFI. Ya do it like this, using XXXX as the above CFI's number: {{ __Think again__ Change the gamestate to what it would have been had CFI XXXX been ruled FALSE. }} -- Wonko