Wonko dplepage on Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:25:40 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule


Quoth Baron von Skippy,

>> {{
>> __Mutations BAD! Krunk smash!__
>> 
>> Amend rule 33 to read as follows:
>> {{
>> Each Rule has an attribute called Chutzpah, which is a positive integer. In
>> the event of a conflict between two or more rules, if this rule is one, it
>> takes precedence. Otherwise, the rule with the highest Chutzpah takes
>> precedence.
>> 
>> If two or more rules have equal Chutzpah, the rule with the lowest
>> identification number takes precedence.
>> 
>> If at least one of the rules in conflict explicity says of itself that it
>> defers to another rule (or type of rule), then such provisions shall
>> supersede the Chutzpah method for determining precedence.
>> 
>> If two or more rules claim to take precedence over each other or to defer
>> to
>> one another, then the Chutzpah method again governs.
>> 
>> Whenever one section of a rule conflicts with another section of the same
>> rule, the section which appears later in the rule takes precedence over the
>> earlier section.
>> 
>> This rule may not be repealed or amended.
>> }}
>> Create the following CFI:
>> {{
>> Statement: Rule 33 may not be repealed, renumbered, or amended, EVER, and
>> this
>> CFI cannot be overruled by other CFIs or by any other method.
>> }}
>> 
>> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE.
>> Appeal the preceding CFI.
>> Rule the preceding CFI TRUE.
>> }}
>> 
>> --
>> bd
>> The above == my from field. Duh.
>> 
> -Didn't I already deal with this?
> 
> {{
> __Bite me, Krunk__
> 
> Change Rule 33's Serial Number to 100.
> 
> Repeal Rule 100.
> }}
> -
> 

No, bd added 'renumbered' to the CFI.

Ya do it like this, using XXXX as the above CFI's number:
{{
__Think again__

Change the gamestate to what it would have been had CFI XXXX been ruled
FALSE.
}}

-- 
Wonko