Joshua Caudle on 14 Aug 2002 05:13:02 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] entropy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Waldron" <wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:42 PM
Subject: [spoon-discuss] entropy

> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Baron von Skippy wrote:
> > Damn. One syll. words. Ah well, most swear words have one syll., so you
> > will know just how I feel, it will just be less el. o. quent. Damn
> and to think, if more popele had voted for my tower of babel proposal you
> would have been able to find a refuge.  Hmph.
> Oh btw.  someone might want to amend the monolith rule so that it is
> possible to create and use a monolith while under a syllable limit, or
> they will stagnate and never be used.  Unfortunately the action requred is
> too many syllables... "geometry"?
> Dan
it did pass; see rule 939/0 which just to happens to meniton the effects of
entropy on syllable usage... thpppt....

spoon-discuss mailing list