Re: [spoon-discuss] A lot of replies

["Wonko the Sane" <also_wonko@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> * The creation of a few rules, which themselves aren't that long (I don't
> think any of them top the length of The Grid, at least in my current
> revision)

That's good, as The Grid is a bit too long as it is (though I shouldn't be 
complaining, having made it that way myself)

> * The repeal of a few more rules, because they are replaced or included in
> one of the created rules.  Sometimes a few rules, such as Screw That! are
> combined with others and parts of others into one simple sentence.

Cool. I can take that off my 'To Do' list.

> * The revision of a lot of rules, ususally either a wording change ("Change
> all instances of the word Entity in Rule XXX/X to Player", or some such
> thing), to make it conform to the new rules; or the removal of something
> redundant, such as a lot of rules with (near) identical definitions of
> throwing something

That's also on my to do list - things such as Gremlins and The Football 
really ought to be Throwable objects, but I never had time to write up what 
restrictions they need on them.

> The reason that they are combined into an Uber-Proposal is that if only 
> some
> of the changes pass, then the ruleset will gain the Status, "Wonky and
> Confusing as Hell".

You mean, as opposed to it's current status, which of course is perfectly 
clear and un-Wonky. Right.

> I have a list, mostly in my mind, of actual game changes that will get 
> their
> own seperate Proposals.  My Proposal doesn't really change the game, just
> it's inner workings.

What exactly do you object to about the game's inner workings?

--
Wonko


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss