Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Alterations (wow, that was fast...)

["Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > > > > > -Okay, I've got it now, but this is gonna cause a discrepancy 
> with
> > >Rule
> > > > >10,
> > > > > > but I think it'll be okay because, even though Rule 10 claims to
> > >take
> > > > > > precedence, this proposal will have a higher Chutzpah... yeah, 
> it'll
> > > > >work
> > > > > > fine, according to the bulleted list in Rule 33. Good. Fine.
> > >Whatever.
> > > > >I'm
> > > > > > sure you'll find a way out of this one...-
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                                                    -BvS-
> > > > >
> > > > >Even with a higher Chutzpah, you'll need a 2/3 majority to pass 
> your
> > > > >proposal, according to Rule 10...
> > > > >
> > > > >Athena
> > > >
> > > > -Ah, but I don't, because I'm not attempting to modify Rule 10, I'm
> > > > attempting to declare it null as applies to IRs. And I'm not 
> breaking
> > >any
> > > > other parts of Rule 10, either. Muahaha.-
> > > >
> > > >                                                    -BvS-
> > >
> > >Rule 33: Chutzpah defers to statements in the rule saying a rule defers 
> to
> > >other rules.
> > >
> > >Rule 10 says that it takes precedence over all other rules, so in order 
> to
> > >let the fight between your rule and r10 be decided by Chutzpah rather 
> than
> > >that statement, you need an explicit statement saying in your rule 
> saying
> > >it takes precedence over Rule 10, and you need a higher Chutzpah.
> > >
> > >Athena
> > >
> > -I'd have to hear a second opinion on this one, since neither rule 
> defers to
> > the other, Rule 10 declares precedence, and there's nothing there about
> > Chutzpah taking a back seat to precedence, and my prop already has a 
> higher
> > Chutzpah (13 to 10).-
> >
> >                                                    -BvS-
> >
>
> Rule 33: "If at least one of the rules in conflict explicity says of
> itself that it defers to another rule (or type of rule), then such
> provisions shall supersede the Chutzpah method for determining
> precedence."
>
> Doesn't that say Chutzpah takes a back seat to precedence?
>
> Athena

-Well, no. It says deference takes precedence over Chutzpah, not precedence. 
Neither rule defers, so Chutzpah takes over.-

                                                  -BvS-


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss