Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Tuesday morning)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/4/02 at 2:26 PM Wonko wrote:

>Hey, I just found, while looking up something completely irrelevant, a
>huge
>glaring reason why A) Glotmorf's societies scam doesn't work, B) M-Tek's
>proposals don't count and C) we need to neaten up the ruleset a bit so we
>see these things earlier:
>
>The last sentence of rule 19:
>{{
>Only players may make proposals.
>}}
>
>So societies can't.
>
>And neither can the Admin.
>
>Anybody see an easy way to fix this? Preferably one that doesn't involve
>slogging through the past five or six nweeks and pulling out all proposals
>made by the Admin and M-Tek?

The former version of the Club Prop rule had a high enough chutzpah that it took precedence over Rule 19; therefore, M-Tek's proposals were never at issue.

The current version of that rule is Rule 578 subsection F, which has a declared chutzpah of 2.  It is still my opinion that chutzpah for a subsection is recognizable; if someone wants to argue that it doesn't, it occurs to me that the chutzpah being declared in the rule means the entire rule has chutzpah 2, which is fine with me.  Either way, the current rule for club props takes precedence over rule 19.

The rule permitting the Administrator to make proposals says, "The Administrator may make proposals as though e were a player."  I interpret this to mean that, for the sole purpose of submitting a proposal, the Administrator is considered a player; this brings Administrator proposals into accordance with Rule 19.

There is no cause for alarm, and nothing that needs fixing.

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss