Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Anti-Gunslinger Prop

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/2/02 at 9:46 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth Glotmorf,
>
>> {{ _Now Jest Hold On There, Tex_
>>
>> Add to the end of the first paragraph in Rule 396 the text, "If the
>> Administrator is not a Player, said proposals cannot include repeals of
>rules
>> except as part of a consolidation of multiple rules into single rules."
>>
>> }}
>
>Then Dave would propose to change rules to have no text. Which would be
>exactly the same as repealing them, except the database would get cluttered
>and the website would be ugly. How is this a good thing in any way, shape,
>or form?

I just think the repealing of rules should be done by the players, since they have more of a stake in the game.  Yes, Dave puts a lot of himself into the game, but he has a totally different perspective than we do.  He wanted to repeal the Yeti, for example, because it was more work for him, and not necessarily because it had a negative impact on the game itself.

I suppose there's no obligation to vote for such proposals...

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss