| Glotmorf on 27 Jun 2002 13:49:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [spoon-discuss] pseudocode actions |
I'd like to make a case for pseudocode actions. Yes, they can be used in scams, but as Wonko aptly demonstrated one can do an analog scam just as easily; you can't probably pre-emptively scam-proof the game without preventing action altogether.
On the other hand, if I were to go on vacation but didn't particularly want to go On Leave, I could see myself doing something like this:
for each nweek
{
at the end of nday 10
{
for each proposal on the ballot
{
if a vote hasn't been submitted in my name for this proposal
{
if the proposal was from uin
I vote NO
else if the proposal was from Dan
I vote SHELVE
else if Wonko voted YES and uin voted NO
I vote YES
else if BvS voted YES and bd voted NO
I vote YES
else if WC voted YES and Naath voted NO
I vote YES
else if Wonko and BvS and WC all voted YES
I vote NO
else if a single YES vote would override an Administrator veto
{
if <1d2> == 1
I vote YES
else
I ABSTAIN
}
else
I ABSTAIN
}
}
}
}
Which of course is just an example, and isn't meant in any way to reflect upon the current state of the world or my attitude regarding same. :)
Glotmorf
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss