Glotmorf on 27 Jun 2002 13:49:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[spoon-discuss] pseudocode actions |
I'd like to make a case for pseudocode actions. Yes, they can be used in scams, but as Wonko aptly demonstrated one can do an analog scam just as easily; you can't probably pre-emptively scam-proof the game without preventing action altogether. On the other hand, if I were to go on vacation but didn't particularly want to go On Leave, I could see myself doing something like this: for each nweek { at the end of nday 10 { for each proposal on the ballot { if a vote hasn't been submitted in my name for this proposal { if the proposal was from uin I vote NO else if the proposal was from Dan I vote SHELVE else if Wonko voted YES and uin voted NO I vote YES else if BvS voted YES and bd voted NO I vote YES else if WC voted YES and Naath voted NO I vote YES else if Wonko and BvS and WC all voted YES I vote NO else if a single YES vote would override an Administrator veto { if <1d2> == 1 I vote YES else I ABSTAIN } else I ABSTAIN } } } } Which of course is just an example, and isn't meant in any way to reflect upon the current state of the world or my attitude regarding same. :) Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss