bd on 22 Jun 2002 02:45:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision) |
On Friday 21 June 2002 10:41 pm, bd wrote: > On Friday 21 June 2002 10:19 pm, Alex Truelsen wrote: > > >-But if it didn't pass, it didn't pass. And if it did pass, it ddn't > > > pass. > > > > > > There's no paradox, only one possible outcome. However, if any > > > proposal read that, I'd vote against it. Players shouldn't get points > > > for > > > > nothing.- > > > > Please fix your quoting. My reader cut off everything after Wonko's .sig > > seperator, including your response. Please, please use the >'s, like > > sensible > > people. > > > > And now for the response. > > > > Actually, he'd lose points. It unpasses itself, right? > > > > -Is this directed at me, or at everyone? If at me, I quote Aslan the > > Great when, on his way out, he said unto you, "Even without your pants > > down, everyone can see what an ass you are." There's nothing wrong with > > my quoting- I cut what I don't want and don't screw with the rest. Maybe > > your reader needs fixing. You want me to insert >s into my message? "Like > > normal people?" If that was directed at everyone, then my message stands, > > but it's on behalf of everyone who agrees with me.- > > My reader follows RFC (something) and cuts off everything after "\n-- \n", > the standarg .sig seperator. Your quoting method ruins that method. I'd > appreciate it if you'd fix it. Oh, and you don't need to use '>'s, you just need to munge the sig seperators, so your response dosen't get cut. And our current method is hard to see sometimes. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss