Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:46 pm, Glotmorf wrote:
> On 6/20/02 at 10:39 PM Dan Waldron wrote:
> >> I'm worried about this proposal because it does stuff to r0, the safety
> >
> >net,
> >
> >> namely making it a mutable rule. This is problematical - r0 was designed
> >
> >to
> >
> >> be a fallback for any disaster; I don't mean to sound like I'm
> >
> >advocating a
> >
> >> deathwatch on Dave, but what happens if we suddenly have no admin? R0,
> >> in its current form, accounts for this possibility; under your new form,
> >> it would not - if Dave disappears, we can all declare a state of
> >> emergency,
> >
> >but
> >
> >> the gamestate won't be changed until Dave recognizes and implements
> >> those changes...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wonko
> >
> >Yikes.  That's scary.  I guess there are some things that I haven't worked
> >out yet.  I'll pull the proposal out for another nweek then while I get it
> >all sorted out.
> >
> >Umm... how do I do that?
>
> I don't think we ever established a proposal retraction rule.  The standard
> method is to replace it with something either constructive and totally
> different or totally bonzoid and ineffectual.
>
> What was it Bean used...?
>
> "All points this proposal earns are donated to the Gremlin Fund."
>
> Or something similar.

How about:

{{
Adjust the gamestate such that this proposal did not pass.
}}
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss