Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/20/02 at 10:39 PM Dan Waldron wrote:

>>
>> I'm worried about this proposal because it does stuff to r0, the safety
>net,
>> namely making it a mutable rule. This is problematical - r0 was designed
>to
>> be a fallback for any disaster; I don't mean to sound like I'm
>advocating a
>> deathwatch on Dave, but what happens if we suddenly have no admin? R0, in
>> its current form, accounts for this possibility; under your new form, it
>> would not - if Dave disappears, we can all declare a state of emergency,
>but
>> the gamestate won't be changed until Dave recognizes and implements those
>> changes...
>>
>> --
>> Wonko
>
>Yikes.  That's scary.  I guess there are some things that I haven't worked
>out yet.  I'll pull the proposal out for another nweek then while I get it
>all sorted out.
>
>Umm... how do I do that?

I don't think we ever established a proposal retraction rule.  The standard method is to replace it with something either constructive and totally different or totally bonzoid and ineffectual.

What was it Bean used...?

"All points this proposal earns are donated to the Gremlin Fund."

Or something similar.

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss