bd on 28 May 2002 23:54:16 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Tuesday morning) |
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 7:47 pm, you wrote: > Quoth Rob Speer, > > > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:07:48PM -0400, Wonko wrote: > >> Either all of them can affect my dimensions, or we only have one player > >> (*A* player is any entity who is capable of passing the Turing test -- > >> emphasis added) > > > > I'm not bothering to look at these rules in detail at the moment, but > > there had better be something in the rules that stops the DimShip rule > > from applying to itself. Otherwise the "current location" it displaces > > from is the virtual location, because for all the rule knows the virtual > > location _is_ the current location - which would bring everything > > crashing down the first time someone set +1 Buoyancy of Entropy. You > > don't need five ships for that. > > There's nothing to stop it from applying to itself. > > > And if it doesn't apply to itself (a more favorable situation), then the > > five DimShips couldn't possibly work cumulatively. > > Unfortunately, I think it does... Wow. I'll get to see rule 0 in action! Yipee! I mean, Oh No!