Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Friday night)

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Glotmorf,

> On 5/20/02 at 4:31 PM Wonko wrote:
> 
>> Quoth Rob Speer,
>> 
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 05:56:36AM +0000, David E. Smith wrote:
>>>> Glotmorf's Holy Order of Points CFI is 708, assigned (randomly -- I'll
>>>> only handpick the judges if it's really important IMO) to Rob.
>>> 
>>> That's convenient. I judge TRUE.
>> 
>> I appeal CFI 708, citing CFJ 254 as precedent. [[That was the one where
>> Bean
>> ruled that the effects of rules created by proposals did not count as
>> effects of the proposals themselves.]]
>> 
>> BTW, r127 still has an occurrence of the word 'randomly' in it, which ought
>> to have been removed by the admin's previous proposal.
>> 
>> --
>> Wonko
> 
> Rule 155, which CFJ 254 addresses, was modified by Proposal 265, which came
> after the CFJ.  Therefore, Rule 155 is more current than CFJ 254, so CFJ 254
> isn't a valid precedent to address r155's current validity.

Sure it is. R155 still forbids proposals to have effects that descrinate
based on voting. The HOOP prop creates a rule. The rule is not an effect of
the proposal. Therefore, the same logic still applies and the HOOP is legal.
And I'm richer.
-- 
Wonko