RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: NWEEK 15 RESULTS

["Gavin Doig" <gmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> R33: "Whenever one section of a rule conflicts with
> another section of the same rule, the section which
> appears later in the rule takes precedence over the
> earlier section."
>
> The two rule sections, "after the votes on all proposals
> voted on..." and the veto stuff, are both in r32.  The
> veto stuff comes after the other one.
>
Yes. So what?

When the votes are counted, the first part fires. At that point, there is no veto, so the proosal passes, and it's changes are applied. When the Admin vetoes it, that does indeed take precedence over the passage, so it is deemed to have failed. But the changes have already been committed, and r204 says you can't roll them back. If the Admin had tried to veto it before the counting (say, if when he sent that message to spoon-discuss he'd sent it (or at least the veto part) to spoon-business), it would have worked fine.

uin.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup