Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Votes

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/14/02 at 9:44 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth Glotmorf,
>
>> On 5/14/02 at 8:46 AM Daniel Lepage wrote:
>>
>>>> Proposal 681/0: Just to Show It Can Be Done -- a
>>>> Short Dim Ship Tale
>>>> (Glotmorf)
>>> No - this does nothing. Besides, what's it mean for a
>>> dimship to have 'no wait time'?
>>
>> You didn't see where "raw fish" was equated to the sushi?  This proposal
>> allows players who have dimships with guns and who get the sushi to
>> explosively transfer said sushi to the outside of another player's
>dimship.
>> The "no wait time" refers to the four days one must ordinarily wait in
>order
>> to transfer the sushi.  In theory, if all players had dimships with
>guns, the
>> sushi could be transferred with prejudice once per player all within a
>day.
>
>So I could shoot the Sushi at someone. So what? Maybe if that caused them
>to
>get the Sushi, it would be worth doing. But even if it did, then there
>would
>be no point to the Sushi anymore. As soon as anyone got it, they'd give it
>to someone else. Then it's not fun anymore; it's merely stupid and
>annoying.
>
>--
>Wonko

Personally, I only think the sushi is fun when someone else has it.  I voted against it in the first place.  From my perspective, its biggest effect is to bite four days out of one's proposal-making time.  It's not quite as bad as the PIG, which is why it's lasted as long as it has, but I'm not sure it hasn't exhausted its entertainment value, except for newer players that haven't felt the full effects yet.

						Glotmorf