RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ: Schrodinger's sushi.

["Alex Truelsen" <a_skywalker85@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -Brilliant, Holmes, but you forgot one detail. I didn't have the Sushi, nor
> did I CFJ. I was the defendant, for the express purpose of keeping me 
from
> Judging. I can't tell, does that invalidate your Judgement? I hope not...
>
Actually, while you may assume that was the purpose of your defendancy, I 
have yet to comment on the matter. And no, it doesn't invalidate the 
judgement. It wasn't even in the judgement, only in the second CFJ, and even 
then only in the analysis.

-I wasn't aware I was waiting for your comments. As I'm never involved in 
these things, I can only assume that you don't want me to Judge. There are 
three possible reasons I see. 1) You don't like the decisions I make. Fair 
enough. This little trick of yours is still slimy, but at least I understand 
your motives. 2) You don't like my analyses. I'm going to stop analyzing. I 
find it difficult to put my thoughts on the matter into words. 3) You don't 
like me. *shrug* I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now and think 
it's the second one. Feel free to not correct me.-

                                           -BvS-

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com