Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: NWEEK 14 RESULTS

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/7/02 at 5:03 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth Glotmorf,
>
>> On 5/7/02 at 3:24 AM David E. Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Proposal 649/0 (A Piece of the Action) (Glotmorf):
>>> AFF: Baron von Skippy, Glotmorf, Wild Card (13)
>>> NEG: Dan, rachel, The Voice
>>> ABS: Congenital Optimist
>>> Counts: (3-3-1-0). Measure fails. Glotmorf loses 2 points.
>>> [[ I know it's a Charter Proposal, but it still fails, for the same
>>> reasons "Fight Club" failed last nweek. Someone should consider fixing
>>> that at some stage. Just a note in Rule 631 that "This rule supercedes
>>> Rule thirtysomething as regards vote counting" would suffice, as would a
>>> revision to rule thirty-whatever that specifically exempts Charter
>>> Proposals. ]]
>>
>> Rule 631 supercedes (quote from adm. msg.) Rule 32 right now.  Rule 32's
>> chutzpah is 1; Rule 631's chutzpah is 2.
>>
>> Besides, as I said before, a Charter Prop isn't a prop.  It's only
>"like" a
>> prop.
>>
>> The reason the Fight Club Charter Prop failed was that the Charter Prop
>rule
>> didn't exist at the time that votes were counted.  That's not the case
>now.
>
>Now the case is that it does nothing because the rules providing for what
>happens when a 'Charter Prop' passes don't seem to exist.
>
>The upside is that Glotmorf doesn't lose any points.
>
>--
>Wonko

Like I said before, the Administrator already set a precedent by putting one Society rule on a separate webpage, so there's a place to put the Charter Prop too.

						Glotmorf