Glotmorf on 3 May 2002 00:07:30 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Commentary |
On 5/2/02 at 12:23 PM Daniel Lepage wrote: >The point I'm trying to get across here is that quoted >text is *not* the original text. The original text >appeared in [[]]s and so it, according to r8, "shall >be considered "comment" text". However, the quote of >it is not the original text. It is a copy of it. The >copy is, quite obviously, *not* appearing within >double square brackets, and so, under the r8 >definition of a comment, is not a comment. And so it >may have the Force of Rule. > >But hey, if you don't like it, feel free to CFJ. > >-- >Wonko I could do that...I'd been thinking about it...though I'd like to get a bigger swatch of opinions than we've had so far, to see if I'm the only one who actually sees what I'm talking about. (Always a scary idea.) How would people feel overall about...a Judgment Prop? Glotmorf