Glotmorf on 3 May 2002 00:07:30 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Commentary


On 5/2/02 at 12:23 PM Daniel Lepage wrote:

>The point I'm trying to get across here is that quoted
>text is *not* the original text. The original text
>appeared in [[]]s and so it, according to r8, "shall
>be considered "comment" text". However, the quote of
>it is not the original text. It is a copy of it. The
>copy is, quite obviously, *not* appearing within
>double square brackets, and so, under the r8
>definition of a comment, is not a comment. And so it
>may have the Force of Rule.
>
>But hey, if you don't like it, feel free to CFJ.
>
>--
>Wonko

I could do that...I'd been thinking about it...though I'd like to get a bigger swatch of opinions than we've had so far, to see if I'm the only one who actually sees what I'm talking about. (Always a scary idea.)

How would people feel overall about...a Judgment Prop?

						Glotmorf