RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RulRes 2

["Gavin Doig" <gmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> to change the gamestate as if certain acts in the past
> were legal is to declare those acts to be legal.
>
No. It's to change the present to what it would be if they had been legal. Granted, from the point of view of the rules it will look the same as if the past were different from how it actually was, but that's not the same thing (and even then, because this proosal is itself part of the past, it only superficially looks like the past was different - if you look closer, the past is consistent). There's no reason why a proosal can't arbitrarily change the current gamestate to anything it likes.

uin.
-- 

_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup