Glotmorf on 24 Apr 2002 21:59:33 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: CFJ: Mu |
On 4/24/02 at 11:18 AM Alex Truelsen wrote: ><CFJ> ><statement>Baron von Skippy is the defendant for this CFJ.</statement> ><defendant>Baron von Skippy.</defendant> ></CFJ> > >-Okay, you've lost it. This is one of the more gratuitous CFJs I've ever >seen, and given your history of CFJs, that's saying something. So, how >should the Judge be selected? If this CFJ is judges FALSE, I'm an eligible >Judge. If TRUE, I'm not. So, which should Mr. A predict when selecting a >Judge?- > > -BvS- > >-P.S. Oh, I almost forgot. What is wrong with you? What possible purpose >could this CFJ serve? Answer either or both of those.- Dude. He sent this to spoon-discuss. That means it's pure entertainment. Or your reaction to it is...:) Glotmorf