Jonathan David Amery on 19 Apr 2002 00:16:56 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Proposal] Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Do your best to change the subject. |
> Wild Card, since you joined the game post-judicial reform season, I > recommend you look at nweek 4 and 5's proposals (historical stuff). In > particular, I think you should examine proposal 236 (Scoff!'s initial > attempt at judicial reform) and proposals 275 and 276 (My attempt to take > a referrendum on the issue... neither passed. I personally think that > 276 is an especially good piece of work). What do you think of > those? 276 looks quite good :) You've missed out saying that if the Admin is defendant then the plaintiff can't be the player to randomly select a Judge. You also haven't specified the case where the Admin is the plaintiff. WC.