spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: The end of nweek 7: non-vote-counting-stuff

[Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, David E. Smith wrote:
> First, responses to stuff on the ballot:
> 
> On 362:
> 
> > Yes, but needs rectification - 'confroming' should be 'conforming'
> > (happens twice), and I think Bean meant to say 'If Proposal 343
> > *failed*', 'cause the way it's written now the rule only gives people
> > Respect if there's no such thing.
> 
> The first change is legal and obvious, and so rectified. The second
> change, changes the meaning of the proosal substantially, so I don't think
> I can legally do that.

Heh.... who was it that was opposed to the poetic forms because they gave
respect to people?  I just realised you got your wish through my being a
moron. :)

Bean