Eric Gerlach on 18 Jan 2002 17:08:41 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Revisions to my proposals

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Doig, Gavin wrote:

> > The Analysis of the Judgement is the reasoning that the Judge used to
> > arrive at the Judgement, and must be a direct interpretation of the
> rules.
> I still think this should take into account game custom and precedence.
> Is that an oversight, or do you disagree?

I'll add precedent (that was an unintentional omission).... but the more I
think about it, the more I don't want to use the phrase "game custom".  Do
you think that's a problem?