Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Revisions to my proposals

[Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Doig, Gavin wrote:

> 
> > The Analysis of the Judgement is the reasoning that the Judge used to
> > arrive at the Judgement, and must be a direct interpretation of the
> rules.
> 
> I still think this should take into account game custom and precedence.
> Is that an oversight, or do you disagree?

I'll add precedent (that was an unintentional omission).... but the more I
think about it, the more I don't want to use the phrase "game custom".  Do
you think that's a problem?

Bean