Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Moderation among the justice reform

[ID Scott <Iain.Scott.01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Antonio wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:22:07 -0500, Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> >If the Administrator has been named as the Defendant in a CFJ, e may not 
> >select a judge.  Instead, that duty falls to the player with the highest Score.
> >}}
> >
> this is a abusable:
> suppose I am the player with the highest score and I submit a CFJ naming
> the Administrator as Defendant.
> I'd get to judge my own CFJ

Anything is abusable, but in this case I think the the task which falls
to the player with the highest score is the task of randomly selecting a
judge _from the eligable players_, and the player who submited a CFJ is
inelegible to be selected to judge it. Or at least that would be my
analysis, where I called to Judge a CFJ.

chers,
Iain