| Greg Ritter on 13 Jan 2002 16:23:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- invalid proposals |
At 05:35 AM 1/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Proposals 229, 230, 231, 240, 241 and 242 are not valid proposals because they do not use the Standard Delimiters listed in Rule 217.
Nowhere does Rule 217 require that the Standard Delimiters be used; it only defines what they mean.