Doig, Gavin on 10 Jan 2002 10:27:41 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: The most-revised proposal ever: 236 again

Title: RE: spoon-business: The most-revised proposal ever: 236 again

> However, the indirect effect of the ruling on a CFJ may require
> alterations to the rule set or game state, to bring them in accordance
> with the judgement.
No! Kitty is a bad Kitty!

By which I mean, the ruling should never change anything. It may require changes to *our records of things*, but that's not the same thing. Although the opposite viewpoint is probably defensible.

Platonism, not idealism.

This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is  privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable  law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible.

The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited