Jonathan Van Matre on 9 Jan 2002 19:55:29 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: spoon-discuss: Re: Revision of 236 |
What would it mean for an Undecided ruling to be part of game custom, exactly? That we customarily don't bother to decide that issue? My reasoning is that True or False are ways of making a clear decision about what our custom is at the moment. Undecided and Refused, on the other hand, indicate that the Judge either can't or won't determine what the current custom is. Since the Judge has made no determination of custom, how then can the ruling and statement be part of game custom? > This part is strange, what you are proposing is basically: > > -if the ruling is TRUE or FALSE then the *statement and the > ruling* are > part of game custom > -if the ruling is UNDECIDED or REFUSED then the *statement > and the ruling* > are NOT part of game custom > > I think the second part is unnecessary, and actually it would > be better if > Undecided and Refused rulings were part of game custom too. > > heck, why not? Is ther a loophole I don't see? > -- > Antonio > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >