RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RE: Proposal: _My Gavel Up Your Ass_ (aka No Judicial Kickbacks)

["Jonathan Van Matre" <JVanMatre@xxxxxxxx>]

Under current law, it would appear you are correct.  Hence the final
"sleeper" paragraph in my proposal.

--Scoff!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Whytock [mailto:dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RE: Proposal: _My Gavel Up
> Your Ass_ (aka No Judicial Kickbacks)
> 
> 
> On 1/7/02 at 1:01 PM Jonathan Van Matre wrote:
> 
> >> At the time of the passage of this proposal, any CFJ judged 
> >> in the past 10 ndays that referred specifically to the judge 
> >> assigned to judge that CFJ, or the judge specifically 
> >> assigned to judge any other specific CFJ, will have its 
> >> ruling summarily changed to REFUSED.  This paragraph will then 
> >> delete itself from this rule.  The following paragraph is 
> >> inactive until this paragraph is deleted.
> 
> So...a judgment is a revisable object?  As in, players can 
> submit proposals to reverse judgments? :)
> 
> 						Glotmorf
> 
> 
>