Dan on 25 Dec 2001 21:31:21 -0000
[
Date Prev
] [
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
] [
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
spoon-discuss: Judiciary reform
To
: Discussion Nomic <
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: spoon-discuss: Judiciary reform
From
: Dan <
dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 16:31:19 -0500
User-agent
: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Title:
Judiciary reform
I don't understand the second to last sentence of Judiciary reform #1:
Calls for Judgement is given a serial number as if it were a revisable
object.
Does this mean that each individual CFJ gets a number, or the set of all CFJs gets a single number?
Prev by Date:
spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Fixing the rules
Next by Date:
spoon-discuss: Judiciary Reform, version 2b
Previous by thread:
spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Fixing the rules
Next by thread:
spoon-discuss: Judiciary Reform, version 2b
Index(es):
Date
Thread