RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Change the win conditions

["Harrison, Andrew" <andy.harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Rob Speer [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

> Well, it seemed that if getting proposals passed (which 
> counting rules was a
> really lousy way of measuring) was such an important part of 
> winning, it should

	<snip!>

When I added the ownership of rules, the addition of the 'number of rules'
condition to the win rule was really only a side issue as far as I was
concerned. Once we'd established rule ownership I was planning to add things
on the end of rules that only affected the owner of the rule. For example
you could add a bit to the pooker showdown rule that said "Whenever a player
plays three of a kind or higher, the owner of this rule gets dealt an extra
card". It could add an extra twist to the game. I just never actually got
round to proposing such things. You can't really propose them on their own,
cos nobody will vote for them, so you have to include them in larger
proposals.

I'm going to drop out of the game soon anyway, I've got some more important
stuff to worry about. Turns out I'm gonna be a Dad!

--
The Kid