Joel Uckelman on 16 Mar 2001 16:41:08 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Motion to Amend Trivialy


Quoth "Harrison, Andrew":
> > I move to Amend Trivialy each non-case-specific instance of 
> > "Repayment" in
> > the rules to "Payment"
> > 
> > [[My previous effort to fix this resulted in changing about half of
> > them.]]
> 
> I'm not too sure that a global replacement like that can really be called a
> 'trivial' change. Isn't there any sort of limit on what can be in a trivial
> change?
> 
> --
> The Kid

Triviality is in the eye of the objector. It's easy to recognize, but 
enormously difficult to define precisely. This shouldn't be a problem, 
though, since you can object if you don't think it's a trivial change.

-- 
J.