Joel Uckelman on 16 Mar 2001 16:41:08 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Motion to Amend Trivialy |
Quoth "Harrison, Andrew": > > I move to Amend Trivialy each non-case-specific instance of > > "Repayment" in > > the rules to "Payment" > > > > [[My previous effort to fix this resulted in changing about half of > > them.]] > > I'm not too sure that a global replacement like that can really be called a > 'trivial' change. Isn't there any sort of limit on what can be in a trivial > change? > > -- > The Kid Triviality is in the eye of the objector. It's easy to recognize, but enormously difficult to define precisely. This shouldn't be a problem, though, since you can object if you don't think it's a trivial change. -- J.