Dan on 16 Mar 2001 16:28:14 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ 28: Ruling 

> >> Debts are not Objects as defined by Rule 316/0.
> 
> I Rule: FALSE

This is judicial precedent that the rules are non-case specific.
Capitalization of the rules is there only to look nice.  I like it this
way (because I usually screw up the capitalization of my proposals) so I'm
pointing this out to everyone so we don't have to go throught his all
again.

Poulenc