Re: spoon-discuss: scoring

Gavin M. Doig on 24 Feb 2001 10:56:02 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: scoring

To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: scoring
From: "Gavin M. Doig" <gmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:56:52 -0000
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10102232244180.13402-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Does anyone agree with me?
>
No.

You communist!

Don't have much time to write stuff right now, but I'm very much in favour
of the traditional nomic scoring system. It provides an incentive to make
sure your proosals are good (well structured) and popular (likely to pass)
before you submit them.

BLMP.

References:
- spoon-discuss: scoring
  - From: Dan

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-business: Re: spoon-discuss: comment on Parties Prop
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: rules naming specific players
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: scoring
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: scoring
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread