Joel Uckelman on 16 Feb 2001 01:44:08 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: P398 revision |
Quoth =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Rathlev?=: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Jorg Rathlev wrote: > > > Change "Newbie Players shall be treated like regular Players,=20 > > with the exception that they cannot become Officers or Judges."=20 > > to "Newbie Players shall be treated like regular Players, with=20 > > the exception that they are not eligible voters and cannot become=20 > > Officers or Judges." > > >=20 > >=20 > > How is that really different from being an Agent? > > > Oh well... since Agents can do almost everything, the main difference is = > probably that you can be [AWAY] ;-) > > Seriously, the main difference is that you can make motions, even after = > the rules have been fixed so that Agents cannot. Joel, didn't you plan = > to make such a proposal? Yes, but not for this nweek's voting (for which I'm compiling the Ballot right now). I'll submit it sometime tonight. > I expected the other difference to be that as a Newbie Player, you can = > earn points, but looking at the rules again, I see that Agents in fact = > *do* have scores. Agents can even win the game. Yep. > Thinking about it, I realize that Newbie Players can safely become = > Officers. Officers are elected anyway, and I guess if the majority of = > Players does not agree with a Newbie becoming a Player, they won't elect = > him anyway. I'll revise my proposal to allow Newbies to become Officers. > > Yet another thought, if there's no big difference between Players and = > Agents except Players can vote (well now that *is* a big difference, but = > the rules even leave a possibility for Agents to be voters), doesn't = > this show that Agents might have too many possibilities? > > > Joerg The purpose of Agents (as I had envisioned them) was as a superset of Players, so we could make Rules that cover both Players and Player-like entities together. Originally, R120/0 restricted Motions to Players, but that was unintentionally deleted when it was amended. The Proposal I've worked out fixes that, and restricts certain Motions to Players only again. -- J.