Dan on 14 Feb 2001 04:20:37 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: RE: names |
Since (as Joerg pointed out), "Joerg" is generally accepted to be an alternate version of--well I can't type it on this link but you know what I mean--I don't see why we can't consider them to be typographically equivalent. We could even make a rule to that effect, but since it is an established custom in english usage it probably doesn't even have to be a rule. It doesn't matter which is used because they are different typographical representations of the same word, even the same letters. Poulenc