Josh on 16 Jan 2001 04:24:24 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Negative Voting


Joel Uckelman sez:
>Quoth Dan Waldron:
>> 
>> The following is a new proposal entitled "Foully voting AGAINST every
>> single proposal on every ballot really drives me up the wall you will know
>> if youre the one im talking to i really think something ought to be done
>> about this blatant misuse of democratic principles and this is a holy
>> crusade to restore truth and honor and justice and liberty to the world of
>> nomic and anyone who stands against shall have to suffer the wrath of
>> uuuuh me."
>> 
>> Enact a new rule, titled "Against negative voting" with text as follows:
>> 
>> If, on a ballot containing at least five proposals, an agent is found to
>> vote against at least three and for no proposals then that agent shall owe
>> a debt of 20 points to the first agent to point out eir breach of good
>> conduct within three nweeks of the offence.
>> 
>> _____
>> 
>> Poulenc
>
>Sorry, this is not a legal Proposal, since its title exceeds the maximum 
>length for names, as established in Rule 2/0. Keep it at 255 characters or 
>less, please. :)

Furthermore it's just not true. How does Dan know I'm being foul
about it?





Josh
exercising his democratic rights baby

-- 
josh blog: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kortbein/blog/