Josh on 16 Jan 2001 04:24:24 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Negative Voting |
Joel Uckelman sez: >Quoth Dan Waldron: >> >> The following is a new proposal entitled "Foully voting AGAINST every >> single proposal on every ballot really drives me up the wall you will know >> if youre the one im talking to i really think something ought to be done >> about this blatant misuse of democratic principles and this is a holy >> crusade to restore truth and honor and justice and liberty to the world of >> nomic and anyone who stands against shall have to suffer the wrath of >> uuuuh me." >> >> Enact a new rule, titled "Against negative voting" with text as follows: >> >> If, on a ballot containing at least five proposals, an agent is found to >> vote against at least three and for no proposals then that agent shall owe >> a debt of 20 points to the first agent to point out eir breach of good >> conduct within three nweeks of the offence. >> >> _____ >> >> Poulenc > >Sorry, this is not a legal Proposal, since its title exceeds the maximum >length for names, as established in Rule 2/0. Keep it at 255 characters or >less, please. :) Furthermore it's just not true. How does Dan know I'm being foul about it? Josh exercising his democratic rights baby -- josh blog: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kortbein/blog/