Harrison, Andrew on 8 Dec 2000 09:07:35 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: proposal: the price of justice


Disagree with this on two points. Firstly RFJs should be free, and secondly
if there is a fee then it should be the OSJ that sets it, not the Tax
Collector.

--
The Kid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Waldron [mailto:wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 December 2000 21:00
> To: 'nomic-business'
> Subject: spoon-business: proposal: the price of justice
> 
> 
> 
> The following is a new proposal titled "The price of justice"
> 
> 
> 1. Enact a new rule titled "The price of Justice", text as follows:
> 
> The court fee is a value associated with the game that can 
> only be changed
> as specified by the rules.  Initially the value of the court 
> fee is zero.
> 
> Once per nweek the Tax Collector may change the value of the court fee
> such that it is neither greater than twenty nor less than zero.
> 
> 
> 2. Amend the text of rule 234, "Requests for Judgement", to read as
> follows:
> 
> A Request for Judgment is a Primary Unilateral Motion. An 
> Agent may, at
> any time, initiate judicial proceedings in any matter by 
> making a Request
> for Judgment. That Agent shall be known as the Plaintiff with 
> regard to
> the Request. A Request for Judgment consists of a Statement 
> to be judged,
> and analysis as the Plaintiff deems appropriate. A Request 
> for Judgment is
> dead once a Judgment has been issued on it.
> 
> Upon the creation of a Request for Judgement the creating 
> Agent owes one
> court fee to the bank, due two weeks from the date of creation.
> 
> -------
> 
> Poulenc
>