Harrison, Andrew on 8 Dec 2000 09:07:35 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: proposal: the price of justice |
Disagree with this on two points. Firstly RFJs should be free, and secondly if there is a fee then it should be the OSJ that sets it, not the Tax Collector. -- The Kid > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Waldron [mailto:wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 07 December 2000 21:00 > To: 'nomic-business' > Subject: spoon-business: proposal: the price of justice > > > > The following is a new proposal titled "The price of justice" > > > 1. Enact a new rule titled "The price of Justice", text as follows: > > The court fee is a value associated with the game that can > only be changed > as specified by the rules. Initially the value of the court > fee is zero. > > Once per nweek the Tax Collector may change the value of the court fee > such that it is neither greater than twenty nor less than zero. > > > 2. Amend the text of rule 234, "Requests for Judgement", to read as > follows: > > A Request for Judgment is a Primary Unilateral Motion. An > Agent may, at > any time, initiate judicial proceedings in any matter by > making a Request > for Judgment. That Agent shall be known as the Plaintiff with > regard to > the Request. A Request for Judgment consists of a Statement > to be judged, > and analysis as the Plaintiff deems appropriate. A Request > for Judgment is > dead once a Judgment has been issued on it. > > Upon the creation of a Request for Judgement the creating > Agent owes one > court fee to the bank, due two weeks from the date of creation. > > ------- > > Poulenc >