Joel Uckelman on 14 Nov 2000 03:48:16 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: voting generalization |
So, it occurs to me that voting on Proposals and the voting we might do for elections are similar enough that maybe we should have a generalized voting procedure to cover both. But, voting can be seen as a game which takes certain inputs and gives a single output, the "winner". In the case of voting on Proposals, the winner (yea or nay) is, barring some complications introduced by quorum, the one which matches more votes. Though we don't have any use for it at the moment, a different winner function could be used--one that, for instance, picks out a minimum or median. If we defined something like a "simple game", of which "voting" is a particular type, the conceptual framework for doing things like playing Mediocrity and such would be available should we decide to do so. Is anybody interested in something like this? -- J. -- Play Nomic! http://www.nomic.net