Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: voting results

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Wbfu Xbegorva:
> 
> Joel Uckelman sprach:
> >Unfortunately, we failed to meet quorum again--there are thirteen players, 
> >and only six voted. This time, there were no procedural snafus (the ballot 
> >went out on time and was correct, voting times are listed on the page, 
> >etc.), so I'm wondering what happened. There were quite a few proposals on 
> >which to vote (20, by my count), so maybe some players felt overwhelmed and 
> >didn't vote. That's counterproductive, though, since all of the proposals 
> >will just be held over until the next voting period. There won't be less 
> >next time unless some of them are withdrawn. Really frustrating, it is.
> >
> >On a related note, I think we need to do something about the way quorum 
> >works. Either:
> >
> >1. have some way to declare players inactive so they don't count against 
> >quorum
> 
> "Limbo"
> 
> To pass a Limbo rule, you need to make quorum at least once, though.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Josh

Yes, I realize that. I think we should be able to make quorum next time, though. More than one person who I expected to vote this time did not, and we were only one short.

-- 
J.

--
Play Nomic!
http://www.nomic.net